The conclusion of the paper of the paper tries to figure out the results for boys, since the girls results seemed pretty intuitive. The authors argue that perhaps boys need more space or that families want to have boys live in better neighborhoods to avoid risk. They also suggest mom spends more on hair cuts because in their words "This result suggests some redistribution from fathers to mothers, and is consistent with the hypothesis that boys directly increase their father’s utility, relative to girls."
I'm surprised Lundberg writes after seeing this, I'm not sure her husband could be much happier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb403/bb4038344b8c93e7ecb56a9e1dec17a8228e130d" alt="Bookmark and Share"
1 comment:
Thanks for answering my question! Although I'm not sure about the conclusion; my friends with girls talk all the time about how their activities are more expensive than boys'!
Post a Comment