“First, Your Majesty, economists did something even better than predict the crisis. We correctly predicted that we would not be able to predict it. The most important part of the much-maligned Efficient Markets Hypothesis (EMH) is that nobody can systematically beat the stock market. Which implies nobody can predict a market crash, because if you could, then you would obviously beat the market.”
When I first read this response it kind of blew my mind and I really liked. I still really like it, but it got me thinking about a conversation I was having recently about time travel (yes, bear with me on this one). The what if game was suppose you were transported back to a certain year with all your current knowledge and abilities. What would you do?
So let's suppose Bill Easterly and I are transported back in time with all of our current knowledge to January 1st 2006. We know there is a financial crisis coming. With our perfect knowledge of the crisis, how do we stop things. I don’t think we can. Sure we can sell all of our stock and maybe try to short a bunch of stock. One issue is that we could be capital constrained, we likely couldn’t get a hold of enough money to really make a difference in the market.
So not only would a person have to have perfect knowledge, but also the ability to change things. That’s asking a lot.
But I’m sure Bill and I would have one most excellent adventure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb403/bb4038344b8c93e7ecb56a9e1dec17a8228e130d" alt="Bookmark and Share"
1 comment:
I think your only ethically valid choice would be to follow the established moral tenants of time travel: be excellent to each other, and party on, dudes.
Post a Comment